<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Music On The Brain	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/</link>
	<description>Check in for my regular blogs and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: WolfieWolfgang		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/#comment-15</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolfieWolfgang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=1717#comment-15</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Funnily enough, after that Rachmaninov event, I decided to get all snooty about him and sneered at the &quot;over-emotionalism&quot; of the Rach 2.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I gradually backtracked though....maybe a few knocks on the road woke me up to what he was talking about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnily enough, after that Rachmaninov event, I decided to get all snooty about him and sneered at the &#8220;over-emotionalism&#8221; of the Rach 2.</p>
<p>I gradually backtracked though&#8230;.maybe a few knocks on the road woke me up to what he was talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anatole		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/#comment-11</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anatole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=1717#comment-11</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes,if you made a duet of Rach 2 you certainly do know what I mean.  Rach 3 would have sent you right over the edge...but that&#039;s my Rachmaninov bias.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,if you made a duet of Rach 2 you certainly do know what I mean.  Rach 3 would have sent you right over the edge&#8230;but that&#8217;s my Rachmaninov bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WolfieWolfgang		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/#comment-10</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolfieWolfgang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=1717#comment-10</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anatole - I know just what you mean about that visceral experience of playing the Bach Double Concerto at college.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I remember crashing through a two piano version of the Rachmaninov Second Piano Concerto with a student friend when we were young and reckless enough to try such things.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It probably sounded terrible but we loved it and were transported to that special place where performers, even clumsy musicians like me, meet those long-dead but immortal composers.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Just a thought about those Scherzi. Brahms did seem to use them, like his jolly but not always profound Hungarian Dance endings to works, as deliberately lightweight movements - maybe he thought the more the merrier in the Serenade but I guess you could well be right about his motives. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;He did reject the idea of lighter works being called symphonies - this was the time when a lot of French composers were writing serenade-like symphonies (Gounod for instance). Whether he was disguising symphony-wannabes out of insecurity or because he hadn&#039;t yet worked out how to make a piece grow until the last movement becomes the climax in his works, I don&#039;t know.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It used to surprize me that , even when he did finally get round to writing his First Symphony, he still used a light scherzo as the third movement.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Maybe, of course, he just liked them. It might have brought out the pub pianist in him or the man who loved sitting in the park listening to Johann Strauss conducting The Blue Danube.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I certainly hope so.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Thanks for taking the time to write. I look forward to future comments which, I am sure, will keep me on my toes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anatole &#8211; I know just what you mean about that visceral experience of playing the Bach Double Concerto at college.</p>
<p>I remember crashing through a two piano version of the Rachmaninov Second Piano Concerto with a student friend when we were young and reckless enough to try such things.</p>
<p>It probably sounded terrible but we loved it and were transported to that special place where performers, even clumsy musicians like me, meet those long-dead but immortal composers.</p>
<p>Just a thought about those Scherzi. Brahms did seem to use them, like his jolly but not always profound Hungarian Dance endings to works, as deliberately lightweight movements &#8211; maybe he thought the more the merrier in the Serenade but I guess you could well be right about his motives. </p>
<p>He did reject the idea of lighter works being called symphonies &#8211; this was the time when a lot of French composers were writing serenade-like symphonies (Gounod for instance). Whether he was disguising symphony-wannabes out of insecurity or because he hadn&#8217;t yet worked out how to make a piece grow until the last movement becomes the climax in his works, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>It used to surprize me that , even when he did finally get round to writing his First Symphony, he still used a light scherzo as the third movement.</p>
<p>Maybe, of course, he just liked them. It might have brought out the pub pianist in him or the man who loved sitting in the park listening to Johann Strauss conducting The Blue Danube.</p>
<p>I certainly hope so.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to write. I look forward to future comments which, I am sure, will keep me on my toes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anatole		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/music-on-brain/#comment-9</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anatole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=1717#comment-9</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Funny, I bought the Swafford several years ago and never read it.  I&#039;ll have to move it nearer the top of my formidable to-be-read list.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;There&#039;s an early serenade for orchestra that I think could have been Brahms&#039; first symphony if he&#039;d had the guts.  It&#039;s relatively lightweight but it has a fully-developed sonata movement, a beautiful slow movement, a delightful finale....and THREE scherzi.  I can never escape the theory that he threw in the extra scherzi to avoid calling it a symphony.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;When I was in college a friend--we had played violin together in high school and then gone on to the same college--dragged me into a cramped rehearsal cubicle in the music building (we weren&#039;t music majors, weren&#039;t even taking any music classes at the time, so it seemed faintly illicit) and we sight-read the solo parts of the Bach double concerto.  We weren&#039;t very good, but I remember what a startlingly visceral experience it was to make music so intertwined with another person.  Thanks for triggering the memory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I bought the Swafford several years ago and never read it.  I&#8217;ll have to move it nearer the top of my formidable to-be-read list.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an early serenade for orchestra that I think could have been Brahms&#8217; first symphony if he&#8217;d had the guts.  It&#8217;s relatively lightweight but it has a fully-developed sonata movement, a beautiful slow movement, a delightful finale&#8230;.and THREE scherzi.  I can never escape the theory that he threw in the extra scherzi to avoid calling it a symphony.</p>
<p>When I was in college a friend&#8211;we had played violin together in high school and then gone on to the same college&#8211;dragged me into a cramped rehearsal cubicle in the music building (we weren&#8217;t music majors, weren&#8217;t even taking any music classes at the time, so it seemed faintly illicit) and we sight-read the solo parts of the Bach double concerto.  We weren&#8217;t very good, but I remember what a startlingly visceral experience it was to make music so intertwined with another person.  Thanks for triggering the memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
