<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Playing the numbers game with the great symphonies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/</link>
	<description>Check in for my regular blogs and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/#comment-913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=913#comment-913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brilliant Margaret! Full marks for the interesting list and a bonus point for the quick turn-round. Champion mentalities always win through! Lovely to have the Lutoslawski in there and the Dvorak (I tried to squeeze him in and failed). We agree, I see, on the Brahms and the Schubert.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant Margaret! Full marks for the interesting list and a bonus point for the quick turn-round. Champion mentalities always win through! Lovely to have the Lutoslawski in there and the Dvorak (I tried to squeeze him in and failed). We agree, I see, on the Brahms and the Schubert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margaret		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/#comment-912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=913#comment-912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh my, this is much harder. Let&#039;s go with this line-up: D&#039;Indy (1), Mahler 2, Lutoslawski 3, Brahms 4, Shostakovich 5, Beethoven 6, Tchaikovsky 7, Schubert 8, Dvorak 9.&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m happy to include D&#039;Indy officially, and Mahler&#039;s 2 is a fine substitute for the more familiar 1. Mozart and Haydn are O-U-T because I&#039;m not familiar with their childhood works and therefore will not endorse them. Lutoslawski&#039;s 3 was my entree into his oeuvre, so that&#039;s a good fit. I had forgotten Dvorak first time out, so I&#039;m pleased to include him now. &lt;br /&gt;Have I now satisfied the stringent terms of this game?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, this is much harder. Let&#39;s go with this line-up: D&#39;Indy (1), Mahler 2, Lutoslawski 3, Brahms 4, Shostakovich 5, Beethoven 6, Tchaikovsky 7, Schubert 8, Dvorak 9.<br />I&#39;m happy to include D&#39;Indy officially, and Mahler&#39;s 2 is a fine substitute for the more familiar 1. Mozart and Haydn are O-U-T because I&#39;m not familiar with their childhood works and therefore will not endorse them. Lutoslawski&#39;s 3 was my entree into his oeuvre, so that&#39;s a good fit. I had forgotten Dvorak first time out, so I&#39;m pleased to include him now. <br />Have I now satisfied the stringent terms of this game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/#comment-911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=913#comment-911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Margaret but I cannot allow your list! You can&#039;t have the Mozart or the Haydn as they are not within the range 1 - 9. you can have the d&#039;Indy though as single works count as number ones. Also you don&#039;t need to rank them by preference just by number. You need to add numbers 2, 3, 7, and 9 and you will have to choose between Mahler and d&#039;Indy. Sorry to be such a harsh task-master but games are deeply serious! I am dying to see your next list.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Margaret but I cannot allow your list! You can&#39;t have the Mozart or the Haydn as they are not within the range 1 &#8211; 9. you can have the d&#39;Indy though as single works count as number ones. Also you don&#39;t need to rank them by preference just by number. You need to add numbers 2, 3, 7, and 9 and you will have to choose between Mahler and d&#39;Indy. Sorry to be such a harsh task-master but games are deeply serious! I am dying to see your next list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margaret		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/playing-numbers-game-with-grea/#comment-910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=913#comment-910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ranking was difficult, and on a different day might differ. However, I settled on this (with top-ranked first): Beethoven 6, Mahler 1, Shostakovich 5, Lutoslawski 1, Brahms 4, Schubert 8, Mozart 40, Tchaikovsky 6, Haydn 103. If I were allowed an un-numbered symphony, I&#039;d have chosen D&#039;Indy&#039;s Symphony on a French Mountain Air on its own merit, but also because of the happy memory of my first hearing in the class of a favorite professor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranking was difficult, and on a different day might differ. However, I settled on this (with top-ranked first): Beethoven 6, Mahler 1, Shostakovich 5, Lutoslawski 1, Brahms 4, Schubert 8, Mozart 40, Tchaikovsky 6, Haydn 103. If I were allowed an un-numbered symphony, I&#39;d have chosen D&#39;Indy&#39;s Symphony on a French Mountain Air on its own merit, but also because of the happy memory of my first hearing in the class of a favorite professor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
