<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Saying farewell to Joseph Joachim Raff, the forgotten symphonist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wolfiewolfgang.com/saying-farewell-to-joseph-joachim-raff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/saying-farewell-to-joseph-joachim-raff/</link>
	<description>Check in for my regular blogs and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/saying-farewell-to-joseph-joachim-raff/#comment-1202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolfieWolfgang (Colin Bell)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=423#comment-1202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments Ilja, some interesting thought there but, as I&#039;m sure you noted, I qualified my remarks about Bernand Levin&#039;s opinion. I would love to think that our bit of &#034;posterity&#034; will &#034;discover&#034; more unfamiliar composers of potential rank from the countries you spotlight that may well, one day, be universally regarded on the same supreme level as the composers I listed. I, for one, will now always enjoy Raff&#039;s music and have a better understanding of late 19th Century classical music as a consequence. His case is remarkable because he was seen as a major composer in his day and less so ever since. It is generally more likely that a composer falls from that throne than gets added to it . Mr Levin was not that wrong in that we still don&#039;t add any new names to that canon of supreme geniuses that sit at the pinnacle of Western classical music. I would love to hear less well-known pieces by unfamiliar composers who could change that perspective. In the meanwhile I&#039;m grateful to discover what are for me &#034;new voices&#034; in this wonderful art form.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Ilja, some interesting thought there but, as I&#39;m sure you noted, I qualified my remarks about Bernand Levin&#39;s opinion. I would love to think that our bit of &quot;posterity&quot; will &quot;discover&quot; more unfamiliar composers of potential rank from the countries you spotlight that may well, one day, be universally regarded on the same supreme level as the composers I listed. I, for one, will now always enjoy Raff&#39;s music and have a better understanding of late 19th Century classical music as a consequence. His case is remarkable because he was seen as a major composer in his day and less so ever since. It is generally more likely that a composer falls from that throne than gets added to it . Mr Levin was not that wrong in that we still don&#39;t add any new names to that canon of supreme geniuses that sit at the pinnacle of Western classical music. I would love to hear less well-known pieces by unfamiliar composers who could change that perspective. In the meanwhile I&#39;m grateful to discover what are for me &quot;new voices&quot; in this wonderful art form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ilja		</title>
		<link>https://wolfiewolfgang.com/saying-farewell-to-joseph-joachim-raff/#comment-1201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ilja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wolfiewolfgang.com/?p=423#comment-1201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I arrived here through Unsungcomposers.com. While I enjoyed your post, I need to take some issue with the opening quote by Bernard Levin. Appreciating those &#039;unsung&#039; composers, I&#039;ve been struggling for years against the notion that &#039;posterity knows best&#039;. The problem is that that statement is demonstrably a-historical bunk. Such a viewpoint, for instance, implies that Austrians are inherently more gifted composers than, say, Swedes or Spaniards - rather a statement. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the German, Austrian (and perhaps French) musical infrastructure was so much more developed than that in other, more peripheral countries, meant that a work stood a proportionally greater chance of being noticed and being played a second, third, etc. time. Before the advent of recordings, if you were so unlucky to be living in Rotterdam instead of Vienna, there was only a slim chance that your work would get a second chance.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, a city dweller stood a greater chance of getting a second hearing than someone from the countryside: the right critics would be at the performance, and he/she (though most often he) was more likely to be acquiainted to those people that mattered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In similar circumstances, there is something to be said for the &#039;judgment from posterity&#039; - but one always needs to be aware of the many historical contingencies that determine any artist&#039;s fate - if one wishes to be pleasantly surprised by the quality of an &#039;unknown&#039;s work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I arrived here through Unsungcomposers.com. While I enjoyed your post, I need to take some issue with the opening quote by Bernard Levin. Appreciating those &#39;unsung&#39; composers, I&#39;ve been struggling for years against the notion that &#39;posterity knows best&#39;. The problem is that that statement is demonstrably a-historical bunk. Such a viewpoint, for instance, implies that Austrians are inherently more gifted composers than, say, Swedes or Spaniards &#8211; rather a statement. </p>
<p>The fact that the German, Austrian (and perhaps French) musical infrastructure was so much more developed than that in other, more peripheral countries, meant that a work stood a proportionally greater chance of being noticed and being played a second, third, etc. time. Before the advent of recordings, if you were so unlucky to be living in Rotterdam instead of Vienna, there was only a slim chance that your work would get a second chance.  </p>
<p>Similarly, a city dweller stood a greater chance of getting a second hearing than someone from the countryside: the right critics would be at the performance, and he/she (though most often he) was more likely to be acquiainted to those people that mattered.</p>
<p>In similar circumstances, there is something to be said for the &#39;judgment from posterity&#39; &#8211; but one always needs to be aware of the many historical contingencies that determine any artist&#39;s fate &#8211; if one wishes to be pleasantly surprised by the quality of an &#39;unknown&#39;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
